Utenti collegati: 28 
Giochiamo sulle trasmissioni televisive

Indice messaggi | Invia un reply | Tutti i newsgroup | Cerca | Statistiche 

  Inviato da: vevfiv@bigfoot.com  Mostra tutti i messaggi di vevfiv@bigfoot.com
Titolo: M'I.5 Pers ecution , wh y t he securit y ser vices?
Newsgroup: it-alt.arti.musica.strumenti.sax, it-alt.discussioni.gps, it-alt.giochi.toto-tv, it-alt.salute.diabete, aus.family
Data: 02/01/2008
Ora: 11:29:34
Nascondi headers
  Path: mynewsgate.net!nr5-q3a.newsreader.com!newsh.newsreader.com!newsh.newsreader.com!!transit4.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news.alt.net
From: vevfiv@bigfoot.com
Newsgroups: it-alt.arti.musica.strumenti.sax,it-alt.discussioni.gps,it-alt.giochi.toto-tv,it-alt.salute.diabete,aus.family
Subject: M'I.5 Pers ecution , wh y t he securit y ser vices?
Followup-To: it-alt.arti.musica.strumenti.sax,it-alt.discussioni.gps,it-alt.giochi.toto-tv,it-alt.salute.diabete,aus.family,uk.misc
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:29:34 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com
Lines: 65
Message-ID: <gn0800021029319669@4ax.com>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<br /> -= why the security. services? -=<br /> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<br /> <br /> You may ask,. why do I think the &quot;they&quot; referred to are the security<br /> services? Is there. any evidence that there is a single source, as opposed<br /> to a loosely based &quot;whispering. campaign&quot; amongst many people? Even if there<br /> is a single. source, is there any evidence that &quot;they&quot; are professional<br /> &quot;buggers&quot; as opposed to amateurs, or perhaps people. working for a privately<br /> funded. organization?<br /> <br /> a) As to the question of a single source versus something more. fragmented;<br /> it is quite obvious that there is a single source from. the way the campaign<br /> has been carried out. Since things have. been repeated verbatim which were<br /> said in my home, there must be one. group which does the watching and<br /> listening. Since. on several occasions (mainly during travel) people have<br /> been planted in close proximity and rehearsed in what they were to say,. it<br /> follows that someone must have done the planning for that,. and again a<br /> single. source is indicated.<br /> <br /> b) So why couldn't it be amateurs? Why couldn't it be a. private<br /> organisation, for example a private detective agency paid to. manage the<br /> campaign and undertake the technical aspects? Some detective agencies. are<br /> unscrupulous as has. been proved on the occasions in the past when they've<br /> been exposed or caught; they too can have access to the bugging. technology<br /> deployed;. and there are reported cases of MI5 paying private eyes to do<br /> their dirty work (against peace campaigners and similar. enemies of the<br /> state) on the understanding that if they were caught then they. could deny<br /> all knowledge. Why couldn't that. be the case?<br /> <br /> The main factor pointing to. direct security service involvement (as opposed<br /> to amateurs or MI5 proxies) is the breadth. of their access to the media in<br /> particular, and the fact. that the television companies are so involved in<br /> the campaign.. The BBC would not directly invade someone's home themselves,<br /> since it would not be. within their remit to allocate personnel or financial<br /> resources. to do so. An organisation of their stature would not take part in<br /> a campaign set up by private sources. The only people they. would take<br /> material from would be the security. services, presumably on the assumption<br /> that if the cat ever flew out of the bag yowling it would. be MI5 who would<br /> take the. consequences.<br /> <br /> State sponsorship for these acts of psychological. terrorism is also<br /> indicated by. duration; support for over six years for a team of three or<br /> four. people would be beyond the means and will of most private sources.<br /> The viciousness. of the slanders and personal denigration also points to<br /> MI5; they traditionally. &quot;protect&quot; the British state from politicians of the<br /> wrong hue by character assassination, and. in this case are using their<br /> tried and tested methods to murder with words an. enemy they have invented<br /> for. themselves.<br /> <br /> And there are. precedents. Diana and Hewitt were alleged to have been filmed<br /> &quot;at it&quot; by an Army intelligence. team which had operated in Northern<br /> Ireland, these allegations were made by someone called Jones who had. been<br /> on the. team. His statements were denied by the defence establishment who<br /> tried to. character-assassinate by describing him as the &quot;Jones twins&quot;.<br /> Funny how if you tell the truth, then you must be ill,. isn't it? Thought<br /> only. communists behaved like that?<br /> <br /> Hewitt later said that he'd been spoken to. by someone in the army who<br /> revealed the existence. of videotapes of him and Diana, and that the tapes<br /> would be published if. any attempt was made by them to resume their<br /> association.<br /> <br /> 2371<br />

Invia una risposta:





Attenzione: l'invio del messaggio richiede diversi secondi.
Non premere pi� volte il tasto "Invia".

 © Sergio Simonetti 2001 Che cos'è Links