Utenti collegati: 31
Un newsgroup in cui sia possibile finalmente postare
Invia un reply
Tutti i newsgroup
US and CIA Order Google to Block Websites to Help Murder Refugee Author in Brussels
Invia una risposta:
>Patricia Cornwell trial: blocking European websites, threatening to kill >author of Cornwell biography > >Google ordered by US to block websites and shut down political blog, to >help murder political dissident from US in Belgium > >by Dan Hajidah > > >This is published with a maximally open Creative Commons Licence and GNU >Free Documentation Licence: >
alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" >src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/3.0/80x15.png"/>
This >work is licenced under a
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">Creative Commons >Licence
. >Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document >under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or >any later version published by the Free Software Foundation. A copy of >the license is available at: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html. > > >Patricia Cornwell, the US judges and government, and various others, >face European legal charges of illegally blocking access to European >websites for the purpose of racist and terrorist murder, of a man who >wrote a biography of Cornwell's troubled early life. > >Patricia Cornwell's target victim, Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs, wrote his >biography of Cornwell's early life, based on proof sources of which he >also provides a bibliography. > >US judges, whom US Justice Dept sources say were bribed by Cornwell's >lawyers, have tried to ban and block both the biography and the list of >sources from the internet. > >Patricia Cornwell's lawyers even allow this biography of Cornwell is all >true, even though they hired US judges to ban the biography from search >results (it can still be found via link at www (point) dr-les-sachs >(point) be - (Do not write this website as a direct link, otherwise web >page may be blocked). > >Patricia Cornwell is facing legal charges for her threats to murder >Sachs, for the spreading of criminal libel via Patricia Cornwell's hoax >'stalking' and 'cyberstalking' stories, for Cornwell's media lies and >hoaxes that the case is a trivial affair about 'plagiarism', instead of >Cornwell's racist attack to try and murder a Jewish writer; and other >related charges in the US-government-backed attacks on EU citizen, >dissident journalist, and political refugee from the USA, Dr Les Sachs. > >Personal acquaintances of Patricia Cornwell verify that Cornwell has >obsessions about Jews, and that Cornwell savours threatening to kill >them. > >Patricia Cornwell has boasted in Vanity Fair magazine that can >successfully murder people, thanks to her friendship with US politicians >and US judges and government agents. > > >Author Patricia Cornwell has spent an estimated US $2 million in her >decade-long campaign to silence, ban, smear and destroy this non-Zionist >Jewish-heritage journalist. > >As Patricia Cornwell's close friend US President Bush departs from >office, factions within the US Department of Justice itself, are >confirming they hold evidence of Patricia Cornwell lying under oath and >committing US courtroom felony perjury, and other crimes as part of >threats to murder the non-Zionist political dissident Dr Les Sachs - See >some of these internal US Department of Justice files, scanned and on >display at Patricia Cornwell Court Trial Documents: > >http://cornwell-trial-documents.skyrock.com/ > >by Dan Hajidah > > >See also these articles: > >US Justice sources: US 'Trials' of Political Refugee in Europe Were Both >Fraudulent > >http://www.indymedia.nl/nl/2009/02/57826.shtml - also at: >http://mytinyurl.net/bee8e8 > > >Two EU Writers Under Threat of Murder: Roberto Saviano and Dr Les Sachs > >http://lombardia.indymedia.org/node/13581 - also at: >http://mytinyurl.net/10e98 > >Published along with a public domain photo of the political refugee from >the USA Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs at the EU Parliament, under threat of >death alongside Roberto Saviano: > > >The article that follows was originally published at Indymedia Belgium: > >http://www.indymedia.be/en/node/31259 - also at: >http://mytinyurl.net/f35b4e > > >Google Agrees to Assist CIA, Blocking Belgian Journalism Websites to >Help Murder US Dissident, non-Zionist Jew, in Brussels > >Google toestemmt in helpen de CIA, belemmerend de Belgische >journalistieke websiten, om de moord van een VS-dissident in Brussel, >een niet-Zionistische Jood, te mogelijk maken > >Google consent à aider la CIA, bloquant les sites web belges de >journaliste, afin d'aider l'assassinat d'un dissident américain, un Juif >non-sioniste, en Bruxelles > > >by Dan Hajidah > > >Google agrees to help CIA & US judges, blocking Belgian journalism >websites, to help CIA to murder political refugee, a US dissident non- >Zionist Jew and now EU citizen in Brussels > >Damage to EU-US relations, as US judges partner with CIA to take world >political control of Google, blocking EU websites even from EU citizens, >to help CIA commit criminal acts in Europe > >Historic case of US federal judges joining CIA in 'terrorist and racist >acts' in Belgium against non-Zionist Christian Jew, may result in >stopping all future extraditions from the EU to the USA > >EU authorities study criminal motives for 'largest global media smear >campaign ever' against political refugee - CIA, US judges and Bush >financier, not denying they spread hoax stories via global media (CNN, >AP, Wikipedia, NY Times), to help slander and murder US political >dissident in Belgium > >US judges copy Stalin methods to hold fake 'trial' against EU citizen - >US judges and friends of Bush slander political refugee from US as >'cyberstalker', because he does not stay quiet about documented US >threats to murder him - US government sources confirm motives of murder >in order to silence journalist > >Refugee author in Belgium risked his life inside US to fight for human >rights under US Constitution - No US lawyer is brave enough to confront >Bush friends and US judges who try to silence and murder political >journalist > >President Bush friend, financier, and right-wing author Patricia >Cornwell finances efforts to destroy dissident refugee - US judges >return favour, ordering Google to block Patricia Cornwell biography, >hide facts about Cornwell's life; Google agrees to co-operate in US >criminal acts in Belgium > > > >Imagine the situation: > >You are one of the most highly educated people in the USA, a Harvard >classmate of the people who run the United States - but your heart is >with the common people, not with the corrupt US leadership. You are a >successful writer against corruption, and you speak out against the >fascist activity of a friend of the Bush family, who insults the memory >of your relatives who died in the Nazi Holocaust. > >Suddenly, like lightning, the US high judges instantly ban your freedom >of speech, and threaten to torture you to death in a US jail cell. They >tell you that they won't kill you, just so you can spend the rest of >your life paying money to friends of US federal judges. No US lawyer >will help you, the lawyers are too afraid of US judges who are ready to >help kill people and who are connected to the George Bush family. > >You risk your life to fight for human rights inside the USA - risking >torture and death while you try to find even one lawyer brave enough to >help you. But the US lawyers, too afraid for themselves, abandon you to >be murdered, and only a few common citizens help you to hide and escape >over the US border, just as they come to seize you to be killed. > >You manage to escape alive to Europe, along with thousands of pages of >proof documents, documents which prove the crimes by US judges and by >the friends of George Bush. You become an EU citizen and you live in >Brussels, the capital of Europe, and your material becomes well-known on >the internet. Big corporate media mostly ignore you, but you become a >popular dissident and hero among the common people of the America - >common people who are struggling to fight the same kind of evil judges >who threatened to kill you. > >Thousands of people write to you, telling you how much your writing has >touched their lives. You writing is so important, that you have the >potential to save tens of thousands of innocent people from jail and >death in the US prisons. You publish articles about things like the CIA >role on Wikipedia, and you become an internet leader of resistance to >international US crimes. > >But the US judges are angry that you escaped alive to Europe. The CIA is >angry because of your influence on the internet, opposing the crimes of >the US government. You have become too popular in your dissident >political journalism, you are becoming a world expert on US corruption - >so the CIA and US government decide to finish the job of murdering you >in Europe. They begin to take steps to murder you in Belgium. > >They hold a new fake 'trial' in the USA, declaring suddenly that you are >a 'cyberstalker' because you don't stay quiet about how Bush's friends >threatened to kill you. The US judges order Google and Yahoo to block >your European websites, to suppress the whole story of how you became a >political refugee. > >You are a non-Zionist Jew, a friend of Muslims, a man of peace, and the >US government enlists Google to help kill you. So you are sent "to the >internet gas chambers" by the CIA control of Google. Google's monopoly >in Europe makes it easy for the CIA. > >Your voice and writings are exterminated, erased. Soon you will be dead >yourself, and Google, under orders of the CIA and US judges, will erase >the memory of who you are, what you wrote, and how you died. Your >history will be exterminated, and almost nothing will remain but lies. >Google agrees to block your websites so you can be murdered, while >Google places articles telling lies about you, at the top of Google >searches about your name. > >In order to help murder you, the CIA and the friends of Bush plant false >media stories about you all over the world - CNN and Wikipedia and the >New York Times and many other media, fill the internet with endless lies >about you. Dishonest journalists accept money from the rich friends of >George Bush, to write false stories and help kill you. > >US judges, working closely with the CIA and the friends of George Bush, >issue a long string of 'court orders' on Google and Yahoo to make sure >that any replies from you are suppressed and deleted from the internet. >Your voice is completely choked by the power of the US judges and CIA to >take control of Google. The friends of President Bush promise to have >you "slandered all over the internet", and indeed, most everything on >Google now, is just lies and slander and almost nothing else. Many >people are fooled by the lies, after they 'research' you on Google and >Wikipedia, reading what the CIA wants them to read. > >The first step in murdering you is exterminating your voice, getting >your political journalism blocked from the internet, so that no one can >find your writings, or the truth about what happened to you. > >The second step is slandering you with false media articles, so that >almost nothing of the truth about you is visible on Google, just attacks >and lies that make people want to avoid you. People in Europe are afraid >to help you or be with you, because the CIA might murder them, too, or >they might wind up "slandered all over Google", just like you are >slandered on Google. > >The third step is the CIA finishing the job of murdering you in Belgium, >so that your voice can be exterminated for good, so that you will be >dead and can never speak again. They know the only way to silence a >journalist like you is to kill you, and it is likely that soon you will >be dead. Even the police say they cannot stop the Americans from killing >you, maybe poison, maybe an 'accident'. > >This is the situation of the political dissident and political refugee >Dr Les Sachs (Dr Leslie Sachs), who - as he himself says, by the grace >of God - is still alive in Brussels Belgium, an EU citizen under the >nervous and uncertain protection of EU governments, while CIA affiliates >in Belgium openly work to have Sachs murdered. > > >A legal case that could shake the international legal system > >The upcoming legal cases involving Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs - assuming the >CIA doesn't finish murdering him in the weeks ahead - have the potential >to rock and transform the European legal landscape. > >According to some EU legal scholars, given that US federal judges are >themselves involved in committing criminal, racist and terrorist acts >against Sachs in Belgium, and holding utterly fraudulent political US >'trials' to support murdering him, the case of Dr Les Sachs may mark the >end of all extraditions from the European Union to the United States. > >Because the evidence in the Sachs case, shows the US federal judges as >acting in the manner of a criminal terrorist mafia, committing >international terrorist acts on Belgian territory - the conviction of >the US regime in the Belgian and EU courts for their role in crimes >committed in Belgium, may make it technically impossible under EU human >rights laws, for the EU to ever again turn over anyone to the US for >trial. Maybe not even Sheikh Osama bin Laden himself. > >Obviously, if a distinguished political refugee like Dr Les Sachs cannot >get a fair trail in the US - and if the US judges are such gangsters >that they will come join in committing terrorist acts against him in >Belgium, after Sachs was able to escape alive to Europe - then obviously >no one else can get a fair trial in the US either. > >Certainly no Muslim, and no political opponent of the US regime, can >expect any kind of fair court hearing in the USA, if the US high judges >threaten this peaceful non-Zionist Jewish man Sachs with torture and >death. > >The US judges even terrorise Sachs with harassing e-mails in Belgium, >mailed from US courthouses, about how they are blocking his websites >from Google to enable his murder. > >Thus, the case of the non-Zionist Christian Jew Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs, >may save the lives of many people, who thanks to his ordeal, may never >have to face the hell of US courts and prisons, and the death that often >occurs in those jails. > >This is an absolutely historic case, with as many as four separate legal >proceedings that will take place in various courts and institutions of >the European Union, pertaining to the US government attacks on Sachs, >and the illegal blocking of Sachs' European websites from Google, in >order to help murder him. > >It is almost hard to know where to begin. Perhaps, with what directly >effects nearly everyone, the fact that US judges have begun controlling >Google, ordering the blocking of Belgian websites to help the CIA commit >assassination and murder in Belgium. > > >Quick access to the Belgian websites banned from Google by US-CIA orders > >There are several websites with the material banned from Google, but you >can reach all of them via the main website of Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs in >Belgium: > >www (point) dr-les-sachs (point) be (Suggest to NOT put this on the web >as a direct link! - Any web page linking to this site directly, may be >blocked from Google by US orders!) > >Note that the domain suffix is 'be' (for Belgium) instead of 'com', and >those are hyphens within the web address, rather than underscores. > >To view some of the proof files regarding the US criminal acts against >Dr Les Sachs, that forced him to become a refugee, see 'Patricia >Cornwell Court Trial Documents': > >http://cornwell-trial-documents.skyrock.com/ > >More details about the banning of these websites below. > > >US judges seize direct political control of Google > >So it is now clear: US federal judges have begun taking direct political >control of Google and the internet search engines, serving orders on >Google and Yahoo and others, to block non-US journalism sites which >discuss US corruption. These orders are apparently illegal under >international law, and even under US law, but no US lawyer is brave >enough to fight the US judges, on matters pertaining to crimes by the >judges themselves. > >This blocking of EU websites from Google, will be litigated in upcoming >months in the courts of the EU, in this case involving the political >refugee from the United States, Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs, who is living in >a safe house at a location in Belgium. > >Just above, as well as below, is how to access a number of these banned >articles and a free online book, still available on international web >servers, but which Google and major search engines have agreed to not >display in search results in their original location, under intimidation >by US judges. > >The fact that Google and major internet search engines have offices in >US territory, has given US judges and friends of US President Bush, the >opportunity to begin direct political control of the global internet, >and to use the internet so the CIA can kill people in Belgium and in >Europe. > >US judges linked to Bush, have thus begun banning European journalism >sites, with individual US federal judges now seizing power to directly >control Google and what people around the world are reading. > >Some of this journalism blocked from Google, discusses corruption among >US federal judges themselves, and how US high judges and various lawyers >have supported the Bush family and the ruling US elite. > >The topic apparently makes US lawyers and organisations so afraid, that >US lawyers and law professors fear even to comment about the actual >facts of the case. - US bloggers and journalists are likewise >intimidated, and have been at times being directly threatened by lawyers >for the friends of President Bush. > >This is a taboo subject in the USA, the corruption of lawyers and >judges, and no US lawyer is willing to protect the bloggers who speak >the 'too much truth' about this subject. The power of the taboo is so >strong, that the US government and CIA are willing to take steps to >murder independent journalists, like Dr Les Sachs, who escape from the >USA and who write about this subject. > >Likewise, US 'internet freedom' and 'civil rights' groups have also been >frightened into silence, barely speaking about what is happening here, >as the topic of corruption of US judges is 'taboo' and extremely fearful >for them as well. Their lawyers also tell bloggers and organisations to >keep quiet and keep their mouths shut, and just say nothing while >victims like Dr Les Sachs are banned and slandered and murdered. > >Moreover, US and UK corporate media, have aided this banning with >deceptive US media stories, though some stories are now being withdrawn >as European legal cases loom against these companies. The US media >stories attacking Dr Sachs gave misleading accounts of what is banned >and why, obscuring both the facts and the legal issues involved, and >they have told numerous lies about him. It seems a number of corporate >'journalists' accepted money from the friends of George Bush, to publish >slanders to help the CIA murder this victim. > >This internet 'erasure' of dissident journalism by US court orders is >effective - most people never learn what was blocked or why. The banning >of content from Google includes its own cover-up, because you can no >longer 'google' the facts. And huge masses people believe whatever lies >they see at the top of a Google search - or on Wikipedia. Files for >European police show Dr Sachs receiving hate mail from around the world, >just because people believe the lies and slanders they saw on the CIA- >influenced Wikipedia. > >Google co-operates with the CIA and the US judges, because Google wants >favours from the US judges too. Google understands how much the US >judges hate a dissident who writes about the judges' corruption. Google >thinks it is 'good business strategy' to help the US judges to murder a >victim whom they hate, and has been working closely with the judges to >block the victim's websites so he can be murdered. > >This is a way for Google to gain favours with US high judges, regarding >any lawsuits filed against Google. Google can say to the US judges, >"Look, we have helped you to murder that critic of US court corruption >in Belgium, so now you judges should do some favours for Google in >return." > >Thus, the world is deceived to think 'everything is searchable on >Google', when Google has now become a political tool of the US and CIA, >ordered by US judges to 'erase' significant journalistic accounts from >non-US sources. > >Moreover, this banning of sites from Google, enables the US to complete >threats of political assassination, or other criminal acts within other >countries, because the reports and evidence of the murder threats, have >been 'erased' from Google under US court orders. Google is now a tool to >help the US government to murder European citizens. > >This is a threat to the safety and security of Europe that EU >governments are beginning to notice, with the US using the control of >Google to help commit criminal and terrorist acts on European territory. > >With Google and Yahoo under the control of US judges, and US judges >servicing friends of US politicians, and US lawyers too cowardly about >'friends of the US federal judges' to even make any court filings to >oppose their wishes, this is now a recipe in which the US is able to >commit international murder, and then block Google from revealing that >the murder ever happened. > >A whole string of criminal acts have already been committed in Belgium, >with Google helping these American crimes by means of blocking the facts >about these crimes from Google search results. > >Clearly, the control of Google is a major objective of the US government >and CIA, when they try to murder people in foreign countries. We see >here the devious route that the US government and CIA can use to ban >foreign journalism websites from being searchable on Google, while >Google is happy to promote other websites that support genocidal war >upon innocent people. > > >The formula for enrolling Google to join the CIA in banning and >murdering an independent journalist > >Here is how it works, how the USA lines up Google to help murder >journalists in foreign countries. Google knows it is all a game and a >fraud to help the CIA and US government, but the Google company is glad >to play along. > >Firstly, the US government and judges and CIA, or friends of US >President Bush, can threaten to murder the journalist. > >Secondly, if the journalist does not stay quiet, the US judges stage a >fraudulent court proceeding with the CIA, to declare the foreign >journalist is a 'cyberstalker' because he does not stay quiet about the >US people threatening to kill him. > >The judges declaring the journalist victim is a 'cyberstalker', can be >the same US judges who threatened to murder the victim in the first >place, and they can declare the victim is a 'cyberstalker' of the famous >friends of President George Bush who paid for the original threats to >murder the journalist. > >After all, anyone famous is a 'celebrity', and so it is easy for >dishonest US judges to declare that anyone with serious complaints about >a 'celebrity' must be a 'celebrity cyberstalker'. - A simple and easy >formula for slandering a victim. > >Thirdly, have CIA-linked media companies, help to spread the ugly and >quite false slander that the journalist is a 'stalker' and >'cyberstalker', as the corrupt judges have declared. This is effective >when the CIA is able to plant false articles on major CIA-linked global >media: CNN, the AP, Wikipedia, Answers-com, and other dominant >international news sites, where false articles can be planted via CIA >influence, or direct financial payments from the friends of George Bush >or other US political figures. > >Fourthly, Google can then be ordered and induced to block the journalism >websites for so-called 'cyberstalking'. Google will then pretend they >are just 'following orders' of the court, like some of the Nazis at >Nuremberg said they were just 'following orders'. > >Google actively helps the CIA by erasing the victim's websites, and >instead putting websites that slander the victim at the top of Google >search results. Then, the journalist can be murdered and buried, and >only the lies will remain visible on Google search results, with Google >being a full accomplice of the CIA in the victim's murder. > >Google seems very glad to play along to help murder political dissidents >in Europe, so long as US judges are a part of the programme. Google can >say, "Well, we are following court orders," even though Google knows the >orders are illegal and fraudulent, and issued by the same judges who >already threatened to murder the victim previously, and that the >'cyberstalking' charges are a completely criminal hoax and deception. > >Some of the other, less popular, internet search engines have begun to >give way and to allow the websites of Dr Les Sachs in the search >results. But the nearly-all-powerful, monopoly-dominant Google, is >remaining extremely loyal to the CIA and to the friends of George Bush. > >Google is working every day to block the Sachs websites to help the CIA >to murder Sachs as quickly as possible. The quicker that Sachs is >murdered, the quicker Google itself can cover up for its own role to >help terrorise and murder a political refugee and US dissident. > >When Google blocks the websites of Dr Les Sachs in English web searches, >Google sometimes adds a note at the bottom of the search page, advising >that some search results have been blocked because of a 'legal request'. >- This notice is not prominent, and many people will not notice it or >read it. - In searches of Google in other languages, Google often just >blocks the victim's journalism from the search results, with no notice >given at all. > > >A US dissident and political refugee in Europe - and the hidden story of >'famous author' and right-wing extremist Patricia Cornwell > >Google and Yahoo have accepted orders from US judges to block numerous >pieces of significant journalism, as part of a long campaign by >associates of Bush, involving the famous author and political financier >Patricia Cornwell and her publishing companies. > >Lawyers estimate approximately US $2 million has been spent, to attack >and to try and silence the journalist, author, political refugee and US >dissident Dr Les Sachs (Dr Leslie Sachs), who is a Harvard classmate of >President Bush and other US leaders, and also a former neighbour of >Bush's friend Patricia Cornwell. > >At one time, Dr Les Sachs and Patricia Cornwell were neighbours of each >other in Richmond, Virginia, and Sachs was a more successful author than >Cornwell at one point around 1990. But Cornwell had an advantage that >Sachs did not - Cornwell was a personal friend of President of the >United States George Bush Sr (President 1989-1993), as well as his son >who has been President of the USA during 2001-2009. > >This friend of the Bush family, Patricia Cornwell, was built into a >'famous author' by the US media companies, with the implicit >understanding that Cornwell would use her book profits to give money >back to the Bush family and to US politicians. Cornwell thus personally >represents the very close and corrupt financial link between the media >companies and the American political establishment. > >Indeed, Patricia Cornwell has given millions of dollars to the Bushes >and other US politicians and their organisations. She is mostly closely >associated with the George Bush family, but she is said to be giving >huge money to people associated with President Barack Obama, to try to >make sure that President Obama follows Bush in helping Cornwell to cover >up for past crimes. > >Cornwell's book sales depend in part on hiding her relationship with the >Bush family, and on hiding the many crimes and scandals in which she has >been involved. After 1998, the US corporate media agreed to help the US >government to hide the facts about Cornwell's life, and to help attack >and destroy any independent journalist who tries to tell the truth about >Cornwell. Previous journalism about Cornwell was suppressed and >discontinued, and now Google has agreed to block the summary of such >suppressed articles from being displayed on the internet. > >Maybe even more important than Cornwell's friendship with the George >Bush family, however, is that she is also what US lawyers call a "friend >of the federal judges" in the USA. This means that US high judges will >do almost unlimited favours for Cornwell, as a reward for her payments >and political contributions. And it also means that no US lawyer is >brave enough to oppose Patricia Cornwell regarding her political >activity. The US judges implicitly threaten that any lawyer who fights >Cornwell may be instantly removed from being able to practice law. It is >a regular fact in the USA, that lawyers are personally destroyed and >lose their right to be lawyers, if they do not keep quiet about criminal >acts by judges. They see it happen to other lawyers who 'break the >taboo' - those lawyers get disbarred, slandered, and jailed, their >careers and reputations destroyed - so most all US lawyers are afraid of >revenge by the US judges. > >Patricia Cornwell publicly boasts that she is able to murder people if >she wishes: > >See scans of Cornwell's boasts at Patricia Cornwell Court Trial >Documents: > >http://mytinyurl.net/7ee992 > >And it seems this boast of Patricia Cornwell is accurate. US judges will >provide instant banning of the freedom of speech of victims of Cornwell, >and will help to silence, jail and destroy any witnesses to crimes by >Cornwell. > >And while US lawyers line up eagerly to accept Cornwell's money, given >that Patricia Cornwell is a "friend of federal judges", no US lawyer >will help a political victim of Cornwell, or a blogger or journalist who >is threatened by Cornwell. It seems that US lawyers will only cower and >slink away like little worms when Cornwell is threatening someone. > >Patricia Cornwell is a woman of fascist and racist views, and not only >has been glad to boast of her ability to murder people, but also boasts >of how she has US lawyers and judges controlling Google and the whole >world internet to help hide the facts about her life. > >Patricia Cornwell is a supporter of government banning of freedom of >speech and writing, the closing down of political blogs, and the >silencing of political journalism. Cornwell believes that US judges >should control Google and the internet to benefit rich political figures >like herself. > >Patricia Cornwell likes to 'play fascist', she is a supporter of book- >burning, Nazi-style, and has filed lawsuit papers demanding the >destruction of the books of a Jew. > >See scans relating to Patricia Cornwell's threats and demands of book- >burning, at Patricia Cornwell Court Trial Documents: > >http://mytinyurl.net/bc9c6e > >http://mytinyurl.net/505b1b > >Some of the witness statements in law enforcement files are from people >in Patricia Cornwell's personal life, and these statements confirm >Cornwell's malicious, racist and anti-Semitic nature, and Cornwell's >obsessions with whom she calls the 'dirty, filthy Jews'. Cornwell's >obsession with Jews is also one of continual involvement with Jews as >well. Cornwell has relationships with Jewish lesbian girlfriends, as >well as having Jewish lawyers and agents working for her.. > >Cornwell has claimed that her sexual relations with lesbian Jewish women >is 'proof' she isn't involved in threatening to kill a Jewish victim >like Dr Les Sachs. - But history also shows Nazis who engaged in mass >murder of Jews, also sometimes had sexual relations with Jewish victims, >and used Jewish employees, and it seems that Cornwell's desire for >sexual dominance over Jewish lesbian females, actually dovetails with >Cornwell's long history of attacks on the Jewish journalist Sachs. > >In any case, Patricia Cornwell has made it clear she will spend >virtually unlimited money to attack and destroy the Jewish journalist >Sachs, with Cornwell having already spent an estimated US $2 million to >have Sachs banned and destroyed. It seems that dishonest lawyers or >journalists who will help Cornwell to attack Sachs, can get a share of >that money. Some people in Belgium have also accepted money from >Cornwell, to help attack and harass Cornwell's victim. > >With the non-Zionist Jew Dr Les Sachs, Patricia Cornwell has found the >successful formula by which a US political figure can attack a Jew, >slander him, and threaten that Jew with murder. Patricia Cornwell >herself gives money to pro-Zionist US politicians, and meanwhile the >Jewish journalist Sachs, is a non-Zionist, with no major US political >connections. > >The 'Jewish leadership' values Cornwell's donations to pro-Zionist >politicians, more highly than it does the life of a Jew like Dr Les >Sachs. And given that Sachs is a non-Zionist Jew and a friend of >Muslims, the major Jewish organisations, have made it clear that they >will say absolutely nothing while Sachs is slandered, attacked, or >murdered. The major Jewish organisations will completely abandon Sachs >to be killed. > >As Cornwell and her lawyers now prepare for court proceedings in the EU, >Cornwell and her lawyers are not denying they threatened to torture Dr >Les Sachs to death inside the USA, as part of a racist and neo-Nazi- >style scheme funded by Cornwell, a scheme whose criminality is confirmed >by sources within the US Department of Justice itself. > >The scheme seems partly to have been to silence journalism by Dr Les >Sachs, partly a scheme to earn money for Patricia Cornwell's lawyers, >and partly just for the sheer racist pleasure of attacking a Jew and >threatening to torture him to death. > >The fact that Sachs is a non-Zionist Jew, just made him a vulnerable >target for racist murder, with major Jewish leaders completely unwilling >to say a word to stop his murder. > > >Patricia Cornwell originally pushed by her lawyers into attacking Dr Les >Sachs > >Patricia Cornwell began the attacks on Sachs, with faxing the Jewish >Sachs a degrading letter of extortion on 1 February 2000, with a ten-day >deadline demanding that Sachs agree to submit to book-burning and >destroying his own books insofar as he dares to write about Cornwell, >and demanding that Sachs agree to be silent about Cornwell. > >For the original letter from Patricia Cornwell threatening book-burning >of a Jew's books, see Patricia Cornwell Court Trial Documents: > >http://mytinyurl.net/bc9c6e > >This letter of extortion demanding the book-burning of a Jew's books, >was drafted by Cornwell's New York lawyer Michael Rudell - part of a >'Jewish' law firm himself - in what seems a clear attempt to "light up a >Jew", to create controversy that would enable Cornwell's lawyers to earn >several hundred thousand dollars in legal fees. > >The lawyers seem to have been eager to have their hand in Cornwell's >deep purse, playing both on Cornwell's racist obsessions with Jews, and >knowing well how the drug-abusing Cornwell can be manipulated by >anything that her lawyers tell her. > >Working behind Cornwell's back, Cornwell's lawyers then planted a false >media article in a newspaper, telling Cornwell that the article was >planted by Sachs and not by themselves, that "this Jew is really going >after you.". The article was immediately denounced by Sachs as a fraud, >but Cornwell's lawyers hid this fact from Cornwell herself. > >Without knowing that her own lawyers were setting her up and deceiving >her, Patricia Cornwell then immediately agreed to spend hundreds of >thousands of dollars on legal fees to purchase the banning of Dr Les >Sachs' freedom of speech, and whatever extortion activities were needed >to silence and suppress him. > >When Michael Rudell and Patricia Cornwell began their threats and >attacks upon Dr Les Sachs, it seems they did quick investigation of >Sachs via Cornwell's law enforcement contacts. The leftist Sachs had a >long record as an activist dissident, a non-Zionist, a friend of Muslims >and of innocent Mexicans and black Americans in US prisons, an opponent >of the death penalty, a critic of US judges - it was Sachs' past history >as a dissident, that led to the US establishment giving Cornwell a >'green light' to go ahead and attack Sachs. > >With Sachs identified as a non-Zionist, dissident Jew, with no corporate >political connections, the Cornwell operation calculated correctly, that >Sachs was a Jew who could be targeted with extortion and murder, and >'Jewish leaders' would abandon Sachs for extermination. > >For Patricia Cornwell, it was initially just the momentary pleasure of >threatening a Jewish victim. For Cornwell's lawyers, however, the >motives seem to be that of a long-term haul of money out of Cornwell's >bank accounts into their own pockets. > >According to US government sources within the US Department of Justice, >as well as the proof documents, Patricia Cornwell then paid for >extortionists to threaten to have Sachs murdered, winning a fraudulent >'victory' with the Cornwell group claiming that Sachs 'agreed' to the >banning of his own freedom of speech, plus 'agreed' to spend the rest of >his life paying money, to the men hired by Cornwell to threatened to >kill Sachs. The proof of extortion and threats of murder against Sachs >is quite extensive, as confirmed by sources within the US government >itself. > >It was only several years later that Patricia Cornwell realised she had >been set-up and deceived by her own lawyers, that she had been pushed by >her own lawyers into this scheme to have Sachs banned and murdered. But >by the time she figured it out, Cornwell had already become involved in >numerous criminal acts against Sachs, including clearly-proven perjury >in a US federal courtroom. > >For US government documents proving perjury by Cornwell, see Patricia >Cornwell Court Trial Documents: > >http://mytinyurl.net/1 > >Patricia Cornwell could immediately go to prison herself, if she dares >to complain about how her own lawyers pushed her into threatening a >Jew's murder. - Even though Cornwell's lawyers started the scheme, it >was Cornwell's own decision to join in perjury and other offences, and >Cornwell seemed to realise that she had 'won' the banning of speech of >her victim by threatening her victim, even though she didn't realise the >whole scheme had been started by her lawyers so they could make money >from Cornwell and her US $200 million fortune. > >So Patricia Cornwell now seems to feel that she has no choice, but to >continue the scheme to have Dr Les Sachs silenced and murdered, and to >have his writings banned from the internet with the spreading of the >hoax 'stalker' and 'cyberstalker' stories. Although Cornwell seems to >now realise the full nature of the multiple crimes that have been >committed against Sachs with her money, and that it was Cornwell's own >lawyers who selected Sachs as a Jewish target suitable for Cornwell's >own racist and anti-Semitic hatred, Cornwell feels she has gone too far >into the scheme, and cannot turn back now. > > >US federal judges supply instant banning of freedom of speech and >freedom of the press, to enable Patricia Cornwell to threaten murder of >her victims > >Going back to the initial extortion letter faxed by Cornwell's lawyers >to Sachs, demanding the burning of his books - > >Following upon Cornwell agreeing to give her lawyers hundreds of >thousands of dollars to have Sachs silenced, and murdered if necessary, >Cornwell's lawyers connected with a notorious US judge, Robert Payne, >who is described in US court filings as an anti-Semite himself, an >admirer of Nazi leader Adolf Hitler. > >This Judge Payne has a long reputation for corruption. On 19 July 1999, >Joseph Farah, the journalist CEO of WorldNet Daily, denounced US Federal >Judge Robert E. Payne as a monster. Farah said of Judge Payne that: >"... this is an evil man, with either no respect for the law or no >knowledge of it. ... he is one of those judges who believes his powers >are virtually limitless. He no doubt sees himself in a godlike role -- >way above the fray of responsibility and accountability to ordinary >people or the U. S. Constitution ..." > >The US government and court files record a saying about Payne from >Virginia lawyers: "Judge Robert Payne is my name, Federal bribery is my >game." > >By prior arrangement with Patricia Cornwell's lawyers, and completely >illegally, this US Federal Judge Robert Payne instantly banned Dr Les >Sachs' freedom to speak and write, and ordered Sachs to be silent while >Cornwell's media allies spread stories attacking Sachs. > >Some legal writers say this remains the only case in US history where a >writer is accused of 'defamation' and suffered instant banning of >freedom of the press and freedom of speech, without trial and without >hearing. > >Later, as Judge Payne expanded his ban on Dr Les Sachs' freedom of >speech, this Nazi-sympathising US Judge Payne declared that there is >nothing wrong with book-burning and threatening to destroy the books of >a Jew, and therefore that the Jew Sachs is only complaining about book- >burning because he is engaged in 'marketing' of his own writing, and >thus the Jew Sachs must have his freedom of speech banned for the rest >of his life, and must be ordered to be silent about book-burning and >about Cornwell. > >This was then followed, according to US Justice Department sources, by >the friends of Judge Robert Payne threatening to torture Sachs to death >in a US jail cell, and a fraudulent 'settlement' where Judge Payne >allowed Dr Sachs to stay alive and out of jail, on condition he spend >the rest of his life paying several hundred thousand dollars to these >friends of this judge, friends of the judge who operated what US >government sources acknowledge is a fraudulent 'civil rights freedom >foundation', with Judge Payne himself as a salesman for this Foundation. >This 'Freedom' foundation of Judge Payne and his friends, is confirmed >by US government sources as non-existent and a criminal fraud, though >they used a name similar to a foundation involving US billionaire Steve >Forbes. > >No US lawyer would ever help Sachs to fight this criminal scheme, given >the evidence that US federal Judge Robert Payne was directly involved in >threatening to have Sachs murdered, and in massive fraud in a federal >court case. > >Bravely and perhaps foolishly, Dr Les Sachs manoeuvred for time against >the criminals threatening to kill him, paying them some extortion money >while Sachs tried to find any lawyer who was brave enough to fight the >Bush judges. Instead of immediately heading toward asylum, Sachs delayed >until the last possible moment, risking his life to fight for the human >rights named in the US Constitution. Sachs searched in vain, looking for >just one brave lawyer in America, to make the court filings that would >expose the crimes against him, and win a victory for the freedoms of the >dying (maybe dead) Bill of Rights of the US Constitution. > >But no lawyer in America was ever brave enough to defend Sachs, against >Bush-linked US judges whom Dept of Justice sources acknowledge are >involved in threats to kill a journalist. On one final brave day, Sachs >gambled his life, and showed up alone in a local US courtroom, making a >last stand inside the USA, confronting one of his tormentors, and >denouncing the crimes of the people threatening to extort and murder >him. It seems that Sachs narrowly escaped alive, when the friends of >Judge Payne came shortly afterwards, to seize Sachs to jail him and to >murder him in a jail cell, but Sachs was able to slip away just in time, >away northwards to a secret hiding place and then over the border. > >Dr Les Sachs was received into political asylum in Europe in 2004, after >the first phase of the US attacks on him. Sachs published a great deal >of journalism from Europe in 2004-2007, at which time the US judges >seized control of Google to try to exterminate Sachs' writings and his >reputation. > >The banned writings of Dr Les Sachs are significant. They are valued by >many people in the US 'underground', as well as readers around the >world. Though blocked from being shown on Google, links to these >articles are being passed around by samizdat techniques, in e-mail >newsletters among US opposition groups. These writings have also found >favour, by readers as far away from the US as China and Australia, and >many other nations as well. > >Dr Les Sachs is a hero to thousands of victims of the US apparatus, and >his life (or tragically, perhaps his upcoming murder), may yet be of >much more service in liberating many innocent people from the hell of US >prisons. > >As said above, there are several websites with the banned material, but >you can reach all of them via the main website of Dr Les Sachs in >Belgium: > >www (point) dr-les-sachs (point) be (Suggest to NOT put this on the web >as a direct link! - Any web page linking to this site directly, may be >blocked from Google by US orders!) > >Note that the domain suffix is 'be' (for Belgium) instead of 'com', and >those are hyphens within the web address, rather than underscores. > > >Journalism for working people, and victims of the US regime > >Dr Les Sachs is a man with Jewish heritage, a non-Zionist, though >actually a 'unitarian' Christian by faith, seeing Jesus much as Jews or >Muslims do, viewing Jesus as a rabbi prophet, a man rather than actually >'God'. - Sachs is deeply religious, and indeed a good friend of Muslims. >I first learned of Sachs regarding his work to free the French Muslim >Leonel Cazaco, who is held in US prisons despite major proof of his >innocence. > >Dr Les Sachs has working-class roots, and is a 'spiritual socialist', by >which he means, not the government owning everything, but rather Sachs >supporting the idea that workers and the poor should have strong social >protections and minimum standards of life, on the Continental Western >European model, and Sachs believes that such socialist ideals are rooted >in religious faith. > >Dr Les Sachs' doctoral dissertation, noted by scholars at Oxford and >Cambridge, was about an early attempt at establishing a Christian >'spiritual socialism' in 1550s England, whereby the church organisation >would help take care of the poor throughout an entire nation. > >It seems that Dr Sachs, despite an elite education at Harvard >University, always kept his labouring class loyalties, motivating his >career as an anti-corruption journalist. If you look inside Sachs' major >best-selling book from the 1980s and 1990s - a book on auto-sales >corruption - you find that the book is dedicated to working-class >people. > >The journalism of Dr Sachs which the US judges have banned from the >internet, is also written for the benefit of working people, and for the >most vulnerable victims of the US system, for those who are mauled by >unjust US judges or corrupt lawyers. The files for European magistrates, >include thousands of e-mails from victims of the USA, attesting to how >Dr Sachs' journalism has touched people's lives, giving solace to those >who were unjustly imprisoned, or to families whose loved ones were >wrongfully jailed, or murdered in US prison cells. > >Dr Sachs is a hero to common people and to the most helpless victims of >the US system. Meanwhile, most US lawyers and academics fear to defend >or even write about this brave journalist, who seems to have been lucky >to have escaped alive out of the USA. > >Some portion of Dr Sachs' writing is overly emotional, as he describes >the trauma of being threatened with murder, how he became a refugee, and >the people involved in attacking him. The parts where Sachs is angry or >wounded, and his trauma shows, are typically selected when hostile >internet trolls are trying to attack him or trivialise him. > >But at other moments, Dr Sachs is an extremely powerful writer and >thinker, with analyses of the sociology of American corruption, that >other journalists have labelled as 'brilliant'. Sachs has a special gift >for describing how the machinery of domestic US corruption and >oppression really operate, in words an average reader can understand. > >The quality of some of Dr Sachs' journalism, combined with his >impressive credentials (seven earned degrees from Harvard and two other >universities), the very fact he is a Harvard classmate of major US >leaders during the Bush era - President Bush himself, Homeland Security >chief Michael Chertoff, Federal Reserve chief Ben Bernanke, Supreme >Court Chief Justice Roberts, Microsoft founder Bill Gates - with Dr >Sachs having more degrees than any of them - these credentials of Sachs, >his very stature, seem to be part of why Sachs is viewed as such a >threat to the US rulers, why the US judges and government are willing to >go to such extremes to see that Sachs is banned, silenced and destroyed. > >Before the writings of Dr Les Sachs were banned, he was becoming an >influential force in the US populist opposition to corruption and >oppression, and the writings of Sachs were much quoted, cited, and >linked. > >For example, it is clear from the thousands of communications Sachs has >received, that he was a major figure among citizens in an important >grass-roots movement in America, the 'Jail 4 Judges' effort, which has >tried to restore a mechanism to make US judges and lawyers accountable >to the people whose lives they are currently mauling. > >'Jail 4 Judges', whose grass-roots newsletters cited and quoted Dr Les >Sachs' journalism a number of times, is extremely hated by the corrupt >US establishment. It seems that when the US regime and CIA acted in >2007, for the goal of having Sachs' websites blocked and to enable Sachs >to be murdered, part of the reason the US regime wishes to have Sachs >exterminated, is precisely because of how he was drawing attention to >efforts like Jail 4 Judges. > >Dr Sachs' clear descriptions of legal system corruption, were bridging >the gap between the divided wings of US opposition movements, the >libertarian opposition on the right and the social democrat opposition >on the left and among minorities. > >If Sachs' writings were not banned from Google, and if his reputation >was not so viciously assaulted by the US corporate media, Sachs could >have been a key figure in helping galvanise grass-roots coalitions such >as Jail 4 Judges, to help restore a more populist US democracy. - In >Europe, there is much hope for the new US President Obama. > >But perhaps one of the ways that Mr Obama will show the colours of his >character, is whether Mr Obama will criminally prosecute the people who >threatened to have Dr Les Sachs murdered, or whether President Obama >will continue the CIA and Bush policy of having Dr Les Sachs murdered in >Belgium. > >Before Google agreed to try to help destroy Sachs' reputation and to >help enable his murder, Dr Sachs had started to become a magnet for US >grass-roots forces of opposition, forces that exist among the American >people, but outside the framework of the two major US 'political >parties', and the well-funded groups and corporate media which are >intertwined with the power of America's corporations. > >Dr Sachs' readership is among real American people in anguish, and not >US corporate interests, and this makes US lawyers afraid to help him, >just as the US corporate media are eager to attack Sachs and to help >destroy him. > >Moreover, the journalism of Dr Sachs - and his own personal ordeal, >under US federal judges holding Stalin-like fraudulent 'trials' for >President Bush's financial friend Patricia Cornwell - those fake >'trials' are a clear global indictment of the US legal system; a clear >argument why no one can expect a fair trial inside the US, and why no >one should be extradited there. > >The story of Dr Les Sachs is perhaps the key to winning the release of >many tens of thousands of US prisoners who have been wrongfully >convicted and sentenced. The facts about the non-Zionist Jew Sachs, and >his mafia-like persecution, may even turn out to be a means of >liberation for persecuted Muslims unjustly held by the US empire. Sachs >has already himself been working for a long time to help such Muslims, >like the French Muslim Léonel Cazaco. > >In studying this case, one comes to realise that Dr Sachs has been doing >something much more difficult and challenging than other critics of the >US, because Sachs is writing about the internal corruption of the United >States, the corruption of the US judges and lawyers, the corruption of >the media control system and the media partners of US politicians. > >Dr Sachs has broken the ultimate US taboos, as he is talking about what >really can destroy the lives of the average person in America, and this >is much more forbidden than just criticising Bush or critiquing US >foreign policy, which are relatively easy tasks by comparison. > >For example, one US leftist lawyer who has written an anti-Bush book, >Jennifer Van Bergen, and who publishes various articles on US courts and >'unwise' decisions, originally started to write an article about Dr Les >Sachs for the online leftist magazine CounterPunch. > >But then, after some weeks of learning the story, Van Bergen sent an e- >mail to Sachs, saying she feared being personally murdered if she dared >to write an article about the Dr Sachs case. That's noteworthy - This >leftist lawyer, Jennifer Van Bergen, didn't fear to write an anti-Bush >book, but she fears murder if she writes about Dr Sachs and about court >fraud involving US judges, and about the 'friend of the federal judges' >Patricia Cornwell. > >So Jennifer Van Bergen joined a long line of US lawyers, completely >abandoning Sachs to be murdered by the CIA and the US regime. > >In the US, it is still 'permitted' to rant about foreign policy or a >presidential candidates, but what is much more 'taboo' are the topics >about which Dr Sachs was writing in his exile forum from Europe - the >corrupt legal system that has imprisoned nearly two and a half million >people - a system which robs and destroys millions more, and which seems >to be a form of at least subconscious terrorism upon nearly everyone >inside the United States. > >It seems a tragedy that Dr Les Sachs' major writing is largely banned >from Google by orders of US judges, his own words suppressed while >slanders and lies about him are given Google 'top rankings' - It is a >tragedy because now, so many victims of the US legal system can no >longer find his words, when thousands of e-mails show that the words of >Dr Sachs, seem to have brought comfort and understanding to many victims >of the USA. > > >The grief of Dr Les Sachs - the heart of a political refugee from the >USA > >There is an extremely heart-breaking story about Dr Les Sachs' cat, Miss >Kitty, whom Sachs had met many years before, as a wounded and bleeding >stray cat, whom Sachs had found near the swimming pool at the apartment >complex in suburban Richmond, Virginia, where Sachs had lived since >1988. > >Some months after Patricia Cornwell had begun the attacks on Sachs, Miss >Kitty went blind. > >US Justice Dept sources acknowledge that Dr Les Sachs was later forced >to go into hiding, with Cornwell case lawyers threatening to have Sachs >tortured to death in jail, in revenge for Sachs not paying them >extortion money, and in revenge for Sachs trying to hire a lawyer to >fight Patricia Cornwell and her gang. > >As Sachs made his escape, driving away from the men threatening to kill >him, Sachs took Miss Kitty northwards, to join Canadians who would help >Sachs escape over the border. Eventually, with North American borders >locking down by US Homeland Security authorities, and Canada not safe >for him, Sachs was forced to leave for Europe, leaving his elderly blind >cat Miss Kitty in a private home with Canadian friends and other cats. > >Miss Kitty waited for many months for Sachs to return, and then almost >exactly one year after Sachs saw her for the last time, the little cat >died without him, as Sachs says, "Without hearing one last word from me, >Without one last touch of my hand upon her fur." > >Today, when you interview Dr Les Sachs, this is the one subject that >consistently brings tears to Sachs' eyes about his ordeal, when he talks >about this little blind cat whom he was never allowed to see again, >because of the US lawyers and judges threatening to kill him, and >forcing him to leave North America and be a political refugee in Europe. > >For Dr Les Sachs, this is the greatest tragedy of his whole experience >as a political refugee from the USA. Sachs still grieves immensely for >his "little blind girl", though she has now been dead for several years. > >When you listen to Dr Les Sachs speak of the love of animals, and of the >importance of animals in the eyes of God, you realise you are hearing >the core of who Sachs really is. > >For a photo of Dr Les Sachs' beloved blind cat Miss Kitty, whom he was >deprived of ever seeing alive again, see here: > >http://cornwelldocuments.hostfile.nl/images/vxfcpttkwr/3001/les-sachs- >cat-miss-kitty.jpg > >Dr Les Sachs has written this 'In memoriam' about his 'blind child' of >whose last days he was deprived: > >In memoriam: > >Miss Kitty, my little blind girl, my dear child >Whom I was never able to see alive again >Because of the US gov't - Patricia Cornwell threats to murder me, >That forced me to escape to Europe to save my own life > >Miss Kitty, born circa 1989 - >Found her abandoned, hungry and bleeding in summer of 1993 - >Lived with her for over 10 years - >She went blind in late 2001, slept at my shoulder, >She bravely escaped Virginia with me, >Riding patiently in the car as we travelled north to safety, >While the Cornwell lawyers threatened to murder me > >27 March 2004, the last day I saw her alive > >Then Miss Kitty waited for me >In a house in North America >She prowled her small quarters, >Waiting for me for over a year, >Hoping to hear my footsteps just one more time. > >Then, elderly and blind, >Miss Kitty died without me on 15 April 2005 >Without hearing one last word from me >Without one last touch of my hand upon her fur. > >To Miss Kitty: >Heaven bless you, my little dear >I will grieve about leaving you until the day I die >The day on which I will be happy to join you >Where you are now, in the arms of God. > > >Mafia-style crimes of the same US judges involved in the US 'war on >terror' > >In his writings on corruption and court fraud by judges, Dr Les Sachs >provides evidence of crimes by the judges of the US federal 4th Circuit >- the same US judges holding numerous 'war on terror' proceedings, the >same US judges who support indefinite detention without trial, the same >judges who support the torture of Muslims at Guantánamo, and many other >atrocities. > >The journalism of Dr Les Sachs is considered so explosive, that the US >government takes it as a matter of 'US national interest' to see that Dr >Sachs is banned, silenced, smeared, or possibly even killed. - Hence the >long-running CIA programme to have Sachs slandered and murdered in >Belgium. > >With the evidence Dr Les Sachs shows, that the same US judges holding >these 'terror trials' seem themselves to be engaged in mafia-style >criminal acts, the Sachs case has the potential to rock the global legal >landscape, and change the way the US legal system is viewed by the >entire world, as well as block any future extraditions from the EU to >the USA. > >There is ample evidence, and lengthy court filings, indicating that Dr >Les Sachs is under threat of assassination backed by the US regime, with >US federal judges at the centre of the threats. > >Given the substantial evidence of criminal menace upon him, Dr Sachs is >under the protection of European governments, with letters expressing >support from EU government figures, including the government of France >and a member of the UK House of Lords. > >Though some elements in Belgium are working with the CIA to attempt to >have Dr Sachs murdered, Sachs also has significant protection in some >places, including among the household of the King of the Belgians. - >However, the European police perspective, is that they may not be able >to stop or prevent the CIA from murdering Sachs here in Belgium. > >According to EU police officials, the murder of Sachs is more likely to >be carried out by pushing him in front of a speeding car - an arranged >'accident' - or by injecting him with a poisonous disease, than by >shooting him. The current CIA and Mossad methods are to make such a >murder look 'accidental' or 'natural'. The banning of Sachs' journalism >from Google and the internet search results, so the world 'forgets about >him', is a primary tool to enable the CIA to finish the job of murdering >Sachs in Belgium, once he is 'forgotten'. > >The anti-Semitic elements in the threats upon Dr Sachs, have triggered >the effect of Europe's anti-Nazi laws. It is now a major European crime >for anyone to seek to harm Sachs here, or to disclose his whereabouts so >as to assist in harming him. > >So Dr Sachs is partially protected in Europe, and has also received an >expression of support from the socialist government of President Chávez >in Venezuela; but in the USA, there are few with influence, who are yet >brave enough to speak publicly in favour of this important US dissident. > >The US federal judges have held two 'trials' against Dr Sachs, which US >lawyers privately acknowledge to be Stalin-style frauds. US lawyers seem >to almost universally agree, that the 'court orders' banning Sachs' >freedom of speech and freedom of the press, and the orders upon Google >and the search engines to delete Sachs' writings, are all illegal in >terms of US law. > >However, no US lawyer has ever been brave enough to be willing to >publicly defend Dr Sachs, or to file a simple request to void these >illegal orders. US lawyers privately express fear of being disbarred by >the US judges, even of being physically harmed or murdered, or targeted >with smear campaigns like Sachs himself, if that US lawyer would dare to >request to nullify what they admit are clearly illegal orders banning Dr >Sachs' journalism and websites. > >Moreover, US Justice Department sources confirm that it is holding proof >of felony crimes committed in the attacks upon Dr Sachs. However, the >prosecution of any crimes linked to the attackers upon Sachs, has been >blocked under all three of the Attorneys General appointed by Bush. > >A request from the EU is being made to the new US President Barack >Obama, and his new US Attorney General Eric H Holder Jr, to prosecute >the criminal acts that have been made against Dr Les Sachs, and to >remove the illegal orders that were served upon Google, to block the >websites of Sachs so as to make his murder easier. The situation >regarding Sachs, the efforts to murder Dr Les Sachs in Belgium, are >viewed as a direct criminal attack by the US upon the European Union. >Indeed, the US activities to have Dr Les Sachs murdered, are technically >crimes of 'terrorism' under EU and international law, and US law as >well. > >President Obama's new Attorney General, Eric Holder is already aware of >the situation, with the long Bush government efforts to have Dr Les >Sachs murdered in Belgium, and how the Bush government had covered up >for the criminal acts against Sachs. It will be interesting to see if >Obama and Holder have the courage to oppose the criminal acts involving >the CIA and US federal judges, or if the US itself needs to be put on >trial in Europe in order to stop the US efforts to have Sachs murdered. > > >Some US officials wanted to help Sachs, and to send Patricia Cornwell >and her lawyers to prison > >Interestingly, journalists have been able to verify that there are >certain tiny factions in the US government which want to support Dr Les >Sachs, even while the dominant Bush administration and the CIA have been >working to murder Sachs in Belgium. > >Inside the US Department of Justice, there is an 'old guard' of US >Justice Department employees, that wanted to prosecute the crimes of >Patricia Cornwell several years earlier. These Justice Department >sources confirm that the Justice Dept. holds proof of crimes such as >court perjury under oath by Patricia Cornwell, and the proof that >Cornwell hired extortionist friends of the federal judges who threatened >to torture Sachs to death. > >To view some of the evidence files held within the US Department of >Justice regarding the crimes against Dr Les Sachs, see Patricia Cornwell >Court Trial Documents: > >http://cornwell-trial-documents.skyrock.com/ > >Though Patricia Cornwell boasts of her friends among FBI agents and >managers, there are also a few Justice Department people who view >Cornwell as a "criminal slut" who deserves to be in prison. They >describe Cornwell as having "an FBI file a mile long" with details on >crimes in which Patricia Cornwell is involved, going back to the early >1990s, when Cornwell received stolen FBI files. Cornwell was also >involved in destroying the careers of FBI agents, in a scandal that >began when Cornwell had a lesbian affair with an FBI agent, Margo >Bennett, and Cornwell's affair eventually led to a kidnapping and >gunfight, and the destruction of two FBI careers and the imprisonment of >one of them. > >For a 1990s article on Cornwell's lesbian crime scandal with the married >FBI agent, see this from Patricia Cornwell Court Trial Documents: > >http://mytinyurl.net/a94025 > >Moreover, this 'old guard' in the Justice Department deeply respects Dr >Les Sachs, given that Sachs himself worked for the Justice Department in >his youth, and won an award for his work there, helping the Department >of Justice during a time of internal crisis. They see Sachs as a "good >guy who got totally f*cked over by the Bush gang". > >What has hampered this group inside the US Justice Dept from being able >to make a case to prosecute the crimes involving Patricia Cornwell and >the judges, is that there has not been any US lawyer or major >organisation, that has been brave enough to defend Dr Les Sachs or to >publicly call for the prosecution of these crimes against him. > >Another element in the US government coming around to some favour for >Sachs, is the US State Department, which has become greatly embarrassed >in its European diplomatic work, by all the criminal and CIA attacks on >Sachs in Belgium. The CIA and Bush government efforts to murder Dr Les >Sachs on European Union territory, has become well known among various >embassies in Brussels, and it is a great embarrassment to the US >diplomatic corps. > >Though it is not yet clear whether incoming President Obama has enough >political courage to deal with terrorist crimes involving both the CIA >and US federal judges, or whether Obama will also feel he should follow >Bush in trying to hide the whole situation, and continue to support >having the dissident Sachs murdered in Belgium. > > >Proof of crimes against Dr Les Sachs in US Justice Dept files > >One such crime in US federal records, for example, is a fraudulent >"Foundation" portrayed by a US federal judge and several lawyers, in the >initial 'trial' against Dr Sachs. > >In that so-called 'trial', Dr Sachs underwent instant banning of his >freedom of speech, in a phone call from a federal judge, some minutes >after he received the legal papers. Under cover of this ban on Sachs' >freedom to speak, the judge appointed two of his personal contacts to >claim to be Sachs' lawyers, the lawyers and the judge also claiming that >these lawyers represented an operational 'civil rights Freedom >Foundation'. > >The US Justice Department confirms that no such 'Foundation' was >certified with the US Internal Revenue Service, and it was thus a >criminal fraud, a felony crime to pretend such a fraudulent >"Foundation" is legitimate, or to uphold anything done with such a >fraudulent "Foundation" - thus including the whole Dr Sachs 'trial'. > >According to a US federal Appeals Court filing and supporting documents, >the instant banning of Dr Sachs' freedom of speech and freedom of the >press, was quickly used by the "Foundation" lawyers and the judge, to >threaten to torture Sachs to death in a jail cell, and then quickly >impose an alleged "settlement". > >This bizarre "settlement" document is not even signed by Dr Les Sachs, >and is clearly a complete fraud. Sachs had nothing to lose by a trial >and by appealing the illegal orders banning his freedom of speech and >journalism. > >Nonetheless, the US judge and lawyers for Patricia Cornwell claimed that >Sachs, somehow quickly "agreed" to the banning of his own freedom of >speech for the rest of his life, the destruction of his publishing >company and reputation, plus to work for many years ahead to pay several >hundred thousand dollars to the judge's acquaintances, who claimed to be >with this fraudulent "Foundation". > >US lawyers privately agree that this is utterly absurd, and sources >within the US Dept of Justice itself confirm, that the threats to >torture Dr Sachs to death in a jail cell, are the only explanation of >this strange 'settlement' signed only by the federal judge and the >judge's friends working for Patricia Cornwell. > >The facts of this historic case - apparently proving that US federal >judges are holding Stalin-style fraudulent trials - seem to make nearly >all US lawyers tremble down to their boots, putting them in great fear >of confronting the political forces involved. > >The fear of US lawyers for their own safety, if they dare to act against >orders they recognise as clearly illegal, confirm the aspect of >political terrorism here, that there is no justice at all in the US >court system, given the treatment of such a distinguished figure as Dr >Les Sachs. > >After failing to find any lawyer brave enough to confront the matter >inside the USA, Dr Sachs, under threat of murder in a jail cell, and >pursued and menaced by the judge's acquaintances, escaped over the US >border and took refuge in Europe in 2004. There, Sachs immediately made >a US Appeals Court filing (3 April 2004), subsequently filed with the US >Supreme Court, which the judges have never directly answered. US Dept of >Justice sources confirm that this court filing, while difficult to read >because of the emotional trauma in Sachs' words when he wrote it while >still in hiding inside the USA, that this court filing is nonetheless an >accurate account of crimes involving Patricia Cornwell, US Federal Judge >Robert Payne, and their lawyers and friends. > >To view this court filing with the US Appeals Court and US Supreme >Court, see Patricia Cornwell Court Trial Documents > >http://mytinyurl.net/ccf8ce > >The US high judges never answered Sachs' court filing, choosing instead >to cover up for court fraud and extortion involving a fellow US federal >judge. Instead, the refugee Sachs in Europe, quickly became a target of >hostility for US government agents, and eventually of revenge by the US >judges themselves. > >In the Netherlands, Sachs was attacked by US FBI agents e-mailing him >computer viruses on the official FBI e-mail account, and by continuous >smears from media associated with Bush's financier friend Cornwell. CIA >agents and Cornwell's own staff collaborated in planting lies about >Sachs on Wikipedia. Sachs was an early journalist exposing the CIA- >Wikipedia connections, and Wikipedia has had no hesitation in supporting >Sachs being banned and murdered. > >A British-Australian computer nerd, David Gerard, official UK spokesman >for Jimmy Wales and the Wikipedia foundation, has made an official >declaration of Wiki-war and Wiki-hatred, against the non-Zionist Jew Dr >Les Sachs. David Gerard, speaking officially for Wikipedia, e-mailed >insults and abuse to Dr Sachs, and Gerard informed Sachs that Gerard was >personally working to help block Sachs' internet communications, so he >can be banned and murdered. > >Wikipedia's David Gerard does not deny that he is personally an anti- >Semite, taking a great personal pleasure in using the power of Wikipedia >to murder a non-Zionist Jew like Sachs, who seemed helpless and >vulnerable to him. > >For a long time, Wikipedia authorised Patricia Cornwell's personal staff >to operate the Wikipedia Cornwell page as a personal playground and fan >site for Patricia Cornwell. They hid most of the facts about Cornwell's >life, and filled Wikipedia with oily praise for Cornwell, and with ugly >slanders about Dr Les Sachs, using fraudulent 'sources' in articles that >were actually from Cornwell's own publishing companies. > >A major fake 'source' for the Wikipedia slanders, was an utterly >dishonest piece by US law professor Rosario 'Roy' Girasa, who has long >worked for Patricia Cornwell's publisher Pearson plc, as part of the >campaign to have Dr Les Sachs destroyed. > >Wikipedia's lies about Dr Les Sachs, were then of course replicated on >many other websites which repeat Wikipedia material, most notably >Answers-com, based in Jerusalem and which does not deny it is linked to >Israel's Mossad intelligence agency. Answers-com does not deny it has >been working to support the murder of the non-Zionist Jew Sachs, and to >try and destroy Sachs' work to help Muslims. > >Despite the slanders about him on Wikipedia and Answers-com, the >political refugee Dr Sachs in Europe nonetheless re-started his >journalism after arriving in freedom in Europe, and his journalism >became increasingly effective as a leading international voice about the >corruption of the US legal system, despite the Wiki-slandering. > >The journalism of Dr Les Sachs may even have changed President Bush's >appointment to be Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United >States. A leading candidate Bush personally interviewed, 4th circuit >Appeals Judge Harvie Wilkinson, was passed over after Sachs published an >article critical of Wilkinson, and Bush selected Chief Justice Roberts >instead. >Appeals Judge Harvie Wilkinson had participated in the cover-up of the >initial attacks against Sachs by Patricia Cornwell and US Federal Judge >Robert Payne, as Wilkinson has a position both on the 4th Circuit >Appeals Panel, and on the Supreme Court Judicial Misconduct Panel, which >received Sachs' court appeals that he filed from Europe. > >Appeals Judge Wilkinson is said to be murderously angry about losing out >on the Supreme Court position because of the article by Sachs. According >to Virginia lawyers, Wilkinson's own hatred then fused with the hatred >for Sachs of Judge Robert Payne, and the other federal judges of the 4th >Circuit, all furious they are unable to jail or have other power over >this dissident journalist Sachs who escaped to safe haven abroad. > >So, in 2007, Wilkinson's 4th Circuit - the same group of US judges >involved originally in attacking Dr Sachs - authorised a new US federal >'trial' among themselves, in collaboration with the CIA and with Bush's >friends and Patricia Cornwell, with the goal to ban most of Sachs' >journalism from the internet, as a prelude to his murder. > >Thus, the same group of judges who had earlier held the first 'trial' >against Dr Sachs, with the fraudulent "Foundation", in 2007 thus held a >new in absentia 'legal proceeding' against this journalist refugee in >Europe, with the result that now, the majority of Sachs' online >writings, and even his auto-biography, are banned from Google and the >major search engines. The US judges don't want the people of the world >to know that the US conducts trials that are so clearly fraudulent, that >the victims need to receive asylum in Europe. > >The US judges, criminally grabbing for whatever power they can against >this journalist who managed to escape alive from their threats and >extortion, simply grabbed at Google as their tool to help the CIA to >murder this man in Europe. > >It seems this is the only method the US judges and CIA could use to >suppress these writings, of the dissident US journalist and critic of >the courts, who had escaped to Europe and to safety in asylum beyond >their clutches. > >The CIA and the Bush administration directly joined in the new trial to >attack Dr Sachs and to ban his writings from Google, in the person of >prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, who has long represented CIA interests >within the Justice Department, as he did in the 'CIA leak' case. > >Dr Sachs' journalism about the CIA role in Wikipedia, plus his >journalism about evidence of criminal acts by FBI agents and US judges >against him, had raised the case of Sachs to a high profile for US >authorities. It is viewed in some quarters, as a matter of 'the national >interests of the United States government' to see that Sachs is silenced >by any means including murder. > >Under Bush, these people who want to silence and murder dissidents like >Sachs, are much more powerful than the small 'old guard' who had wanted >to criminally prosecute Patricia Cornwell and her lawyers and Judge >Robert Payne. > >The US and CIA greatly wish that the writings of Sachs be banned from >the internet, and his reputation smeared beyond recovery. Sources >confirm a US government fear of how Dr Sachs was becoming a significant >figure for US opposition movements. > >So the devious Patrick Fitzgerald - acting for the CIA and Bush >administration, and to this day not denying he is holding proof of >crimes involving Patricia Cornwell and the US judges - Fitzgerald issued >a public letter declaring, in effect, that any crimes against Sachs >would not be investigated or prosecuted, and in personal support of the >efforts to ban Dr Sachs' journalism from the internet. > >Interviews with Fitzgerald's office via his press aide Randall Samborn, >make it clear that Fitzgerald knows that Sachs is a victim of serious >terrorist crimes. But Fitzgerald's higher loyalty is to the CIA, and to >help making sure that an important critic of the US regime such as >Sachs, is murdered and assassinated. > >The banning of Sachs' websites from Google, makes Dr Sachs' >assassination much easier, and US sources indicate that the >assassination of Sachs, to silence his writing for ever, would be a >'desirable' event for the US judges and the outgoing Bush government. > >Clearly, this is a very disturbing as well as historic legal matter >which is now moving toward litigation in the EU courts, with significant >relevance to other nations both inside and outside Europe. > >The upcoming legal cases in the EU concern: >- these illegal US bans on Google and Yahoo, and other search engines, >preventing them from including these journalism sites in search engine >results, thus violating the rights of EU and all world citizens; >- Google agreeing to use its monopoly power to assist the US government >in the terrorist criminal murder of European citizens; >- a set of criminal acts and harassment of Sachs in the Netherlands and >Belgium, involving the friends of Bush and CIA and other US government >agents and officials, to do criminal and terrorist harm to Sachs and to >enable his murder; >- the evidence of US government extortion and threats of murder against >Dr Les Sachs, including evidence of extensive court fraud in the two US >'legal proceedings' to ban this man's writing; >- what is described as the largest global media smear campaign of libel >and lies ever conducted against a political refugee, involving US and UK >media companies and Wikipedia. > >Interestingly, the attacks on Dr Sachs by the US government and the >media companies, are being cited now by lawyers as technically 'acts of >terrorism'. After all, to threaten to possibly murder a dissident >journalist, and to criminally attack a political refugee, are indeed >crimes of 'terrorism' by the US government's own admission. > >And it is still a crime of 'terrorism' if it is the USA regime itself >who is guilty of this offence, despite how the US is always accusing >others of 'support for terrorism'. > >The Sachs case, and the US efforts to murder the non-Zionist Jew Dr Les >Sachs in Belgium, are more evidence for those who would argue, that it >is the US regime itself which is the world's major terrorist government. > >This is a very concrete issue now, that European authorities are forced >to ponder the activities of the US government, criminal acts to enable >the murder of Sachs on the streets of Brussels, Belgium, right in the >capital of the entire European Union. > > >The media campaign against Dr Sachs, and Dr Sachs' self-defence > >One of the most shocking aspects of researching the long history of the >attacks on Dr Les Sachs, is how easily the journalists working for the >big US-UK media companies, are willing to support the banning and murder >of an independent journalist like Sachs. > >It seems there is no shame among these people in accepting bribes from >the friends of President Bush to write false news articles, and to >publish criminal libels in support of CIA assassination and murder. > >US corporate media, and some UK sources as well, have assisted the US >judges in the banning of Dr Sachs' journalism, via a media campaign >which mis-represented the issues in the legal cases and the documents, >and hid the nature of the journalism being banned. > >These media attacks against Dr Les Sachs have dominated the internet >right from the beginning of the blocking and banning of Sachs' >journalism and websites, right down to the present. And many people have >been fooled by these false media and Wikipedia articles, immediately e- >mailing abuse and insults to Sachs after reading lies about him planted >by the Cornwell media operation and the US judges and government. > >However, the media attacks are now in process of being withdrawn, as >media companies have realised they are liable in Europe for their >deceptions to help in the murder of Dr Les Sachs. Now facing liabilities >in the EU courts, media companies are pulling back various stories they >published earlier. > >As they withdraw the deceptive stories, they don't publish apologies and >corrections. It seems the corporate media either want to attack Dr >Sachs, or just withdraw the story and say nothing. > >There are multiple hoaxes in the media attacks on Dr Sachs. One media >story is that Sachs accused Bush's friend of 'plagiarism'. Yet it seems >clear from records that Sachs never used this word, and that the >'plagiarism' story is a hoax designed by lawyers, to distract from other >facts in the court records. > >Media stories tell outright lies saying that Sachs put a sticker on his >own books, accusing Cornwell of 'plagiarism'. Yet when you look at the >sticker in original US court files, you see that the sticker spoke only >of Cornwell's threats to burn a Jew's books, no hint at all of anything >remotely like 'plagiarism'. > >For a scan of US courthouse files, showing that media are lying about >the 'sticker' on the books of Dr Les Sachs, see Patricia Cornwell Court >Trial Documents > >http://mytinyurl.net/015e6d > >But much worse than this deception - > >The US judges, and the US media, have put out a global story that Dr >Sachs' journalism constituted 'cyberstalking' of Bush's financier friend >Cornwell, 'cyberstalking' because Sachs did not stay quiet about how he >had come to take asylum in Europe, and because he published a biography >of Cornwell with supporting bibliography, showing facts about the life >of Cornwell that Cornwell wants to keep hidden. > >As Cornwell is 'famous', it seemed an easy fiction for the US lawyers, >to try and sell the story that someone writing critically about her must >be a 'celebrity cyberstalker'. - It seems that this 'cyberstalking' hoax >was fabricated in a joint project of the CIA and the lawyers working >with Patricia Cornwell and the CIA at the CIA-linked WilmerHale law >firm. > >The idea was to slander and defame the dissident political journalist >Sachs, with the especially ugly 'stalker' label, to make him sound as if >he was both criminal and mentally disturbed, while at the same time >banning the actual websites of Sachs, so that almost no one could >actually read the truth about Sachs, and what he was actually saying in >his political journalism, and the account of how threats to murder him >forced him to become a political refugee. > >The CIA-linked lawyers at WilmerHale, do not deny that they >intentionally copied the court techniques of Joseph Stalin in order to >slander Sachs. The WilmerHale lawyers intentionally hired a psychiatrist >who was willing to tell lies for money, this lying 'expert' providing >false testimony that Sachs' journalism sites was somehow >'cyberstalking', when they all knew Sachs was telling the truth about >the threats to murder him by Patricia Cornwell's thugs - as confirmed >even by US Department of Justice sources. > >It seems that just like in the 'show trials' of Stalin in the worst >Soviet days, dishonest political 'psychiatrists' are trotted out to tell >lies saying that the political dissident is 'mentally disturbed'. > >Now, however, this 'stalking' story has been shown as false and hollow, >a complete hoax, as the media companies withdraw their previous stories >attacking Dr Sachs, and as the lawyers for Cornwell and the US judges, >now decline to respond to questions, in apparent fear of European court >action where the 'stalking' stories will be further exposed as a fraud. > >It seems now that no one in the Patricia Cornwell gang, is willing to >explain how a biography of this famous Cornwell using documented >sources, and a true account of how a person came to be a political >refugee, also documented, somehow constitute 'cyberstalking' - >especially given the long stream of attacks on Dr Sachs by the Cornwell >media team, and given the evidence that Cornwell had hired people to >threaten to torture Sachs to death in a US jail cell. > >The US judges and CIA seem to have thought that this was all clever, a >successful way to gain control of Google and block people's websites so >they can be murdered: > >Just have a judge issue a corrupt declaration, that overseas internet >journalism has been labelled as 'cyberstalking', and then ban it from >Google so no one can read it anymore, and then no one can find out the >real facts which Google has been ordered to delete. With Google agreeing >to help the CIA to block the truth, all that people will be able to find >is that so-and-so was declared a 'cyberstalker' and 'stalker', a >horrible slander stuck to the victim that can never be erased, with the >victim banned from replying, until the day the victim is murdered and >exterminated for good. > >The US federal judges themselves joined directly in this smear campaign >against Dr Les Sachs, the judges writing long essays attacking Dr >Sachs' character as part of the court records, the judges thus having >their essays posted on the internet, and ordering Google to block any >replies by Dr Sachs from appearing. > >The angry US judges, having no address for Dr Les Sachs and no other >power over him, even had their courthouse staff personally harassing >Sachs in Belgium, with e-mails attaching the judges' 'court orders', >terrorising Sachs with how they were blocking his websites so the CIA >could kill him. > >And Dr Sachs e-mailed the judges back, telling them hilariously to take >their illegal orders and go "shove it". > >The US judges, seizing direct dominance over Google at CIA request, thus >tried to ensure that the internet was dominated by negative material >against Dr Sachs, planted by media figures working closely with the >judges. > >The US judges have set up a streamlined procedure with lawyers for >Bush's friend Cornwell and her media operation, so that new orders can >be promptly served upon Google to ban any new websites or writings by Dr >Sachs that may appear. A long string of orders have already been issued. > >In its service to the CIA to help Sachs get murdered, as it blocks Dr >Sachs' websites from English searches, Google merely appends a timid and >nearly invisible note at the bottom of the search page, referring to >chillingeffects-org to see the orders regarding the banning of websites >from Google search results. Foreign language searches simply block >Sachs' sites, with no notice at all. > >For their part, US and UK media companies who are tied to Cornwell's >publishing operation, or in a position to benefit from favours from US >judges - and also, very sadly, Wikipedia - mounted aggressive attacks on >Dr Sachs, creating quite major internet deceptions about the material >that was banned, centred in the now hollow 'cyberstalking' theme. > >For example, CNN ran global stories attacking Dr Sachs. while totally >refusing to talk to him - CNN is part of Time Warner, which publishes >Cornwell's novels via Time Warner Books. CNN does not deny it has a >policy of intentionally spreading false 'news' stories to help Patricia >Cornwell to murder and slander her critics, in order to assist Time- >Warner company profits from Cornwell's book sales. - With Cornwell being >a 'friend of the federal judges', no US lawyer is willing to file a >lawsuit against CNN over these false global news stories. > >Zinie Chen Sampson of the Associated Press (AP), does not deny she >personally accepted bribery cash from Cornwell's media team, in order to >use the power of the AP to spread the hoax 'cyberstalking' stories, and >to have Sachs banned and murdered. > >The New York Times Company has taken an extremely aggressive role in >supporting the CIA to have Dr Les Sachs murdered. A reporter at the New >York Times' subsidiary paper, David Mehegan of The Boston Globe, e- >mailed Sachs his personal hatred and insults, before publishing an >utterly deceptive story supporting Sachs' banning and murder. David >Mehegan does not deny accepting a cash bribe from Cornwell's lawyer Joan >Lukey at the CIA-tied WilmerHale law firm in Boston, and Lukey does not >deny paying the bribe to Mehegan. > >Quite shockingly, the UK Guardian also has supported the banning and CIA >murder of Dr Les Sachs. But then it turns out the Guardian is >financially involved with Patricia Cornwell's publishing companies, most >notably Pearson plc, which documents prove to have been involved in the >threats to ban and murder Sachs from the very beginning. > >Dan Glaister of the Guardian, does not deny he accepted a bribe of cash >from the Patricia Cornwell media team, to publish a false story about >Sachs, with Glaister spreading the 'cyberstalking' hoax and other lies >about him. The Guardian also allows that it would be "different" if it >were a Muslim country attacking Sachs. In that case, the Guardian would >be willing to support Sachs and make it an issue of "freedom of speech >and journalism". > >But since it is the US government and CIA who wish to murder the >dissident Sachs, and not a Muslim country, and because the Guardian's >financial partners are the publishers of Cornwell's books, the Guardian >policy is to publish pieces that support Sachs being banned and >murdered. > >Since publishing the false story attacking Sachs, the Guardian has >refused to respond to any of Sachs' messages or complaints. The Guardian >seems pleased to support the banning of victims from Google, so they >cannot reply to false Guardian articles. > >None of these media asked to look at Dr Sachs' proof documents, and the >media producing these articles not only largely avoid interviewing >Sachs, in some cases they refuse all communications with him, and even >e-mail him insults. > >In the 1990s, journalists used to describe being offered bribes by >Cornwell, with Cornwell offering bribes hoping they would write false >stories praising her. Now, it seems journalists are simply taking the >money, and, as described above, several journalists who published nasty >articles against Sachs are not denying they accepted bribery money from >Cornwell's media team. > >From this media attack campaign, many other people on the web, have >repeated the misleading media material in an escalating cycle, or posted >or e-mailed abuse about Dr Sachs after reading some tainted source or >seeing a CNN broadcast smearing him. > >A specific goal of this joint project of the CIA and Patricia Cornwell's >media operatives, is to encourage hatred and abuse of Sachs from all >around the world, and to funnel people's emotions of racism and anti- >Semitism, toward this non-Zionist Jew Sachs, this peaceful man who is a >friend of Muslims and who, of all Jews, least deserves to be the brunt >of any kind of anti-Jewish hatred. > >With the encouragement of Patricia Cornwell, the CIA, and with Google's >blocking of the facts about this dissident, the internet is filed with >anti-Jewish hatred toward Sachs, described as a "self-hating Jew" and >with many other insults encouraged by this Cornwell-CIA-US government >scheme to have Sachs murdered. > >Not only are Dr Les Sachs' own websites blocked from Google, web pages >which merely dared to link to him have also been blocked, as the >internet filled with attacks upon him, and while US judges ordered >Google to delete any self-defence by Sachs himself. > >As the WilmerHale law firm promised they would accomplish for Bush's >friend Patricia Cornwell, the Jewish-heritage Dr Les Sachs was indeed >'smeared all over the internet', while positive views of him have been >systematically exterminated. People writing positively about him inside >the US, were at times directly intimidated by US lawyers, while no US >lawyer is willing to help a blogger intimidated by Cornwell, no US >lawyer is willing to confront political threats from Cornwell or her >allies. > >Now, some of us in Europe are beginning better journalism about this >case, in contrast to the quite misleading articles which are being >withdrawn. Journalists in Europe are now examining the proof documents, >that no US scribbler seems to wish to see. > >It is a complete contrast between interviewing Dr Sachs and his people, >on the one hand, and on the other hand interviewing the Patricia >Cornwell media team, and the CIA and US government officials, and the US >lawyers and judges who are involved in banning Sachs' journalism from >the internet. > >Dr Sachs answers everything in detail, and shows you what among the >thousands of pages of evidence is backing up what he is saying. - On the >other hand, the Bush government, the US lawyers and judges who attacked >Sachs, and the Cornwell media team, the CIA representative Patrick >Fitzgerald, are refusing to answer nearly all enquiries. > >Now, with the EU legal cases upcoming, these parties who attacked Sachs, >do not try to deny that the journalism of Sachs which they have banned >from the internet, is in fact truthful and well-founded. > >By the fact the US corporate media is withdrawing its previous attack >pieces against Dr Sachs, as they fear European legal actions, you may >perhaps have your own conclusion as to who is telling the truth here. > >For those who wish to investigate on their own, Dr Sachs makes available >thousands of pages of evidence files which are going to be submitted to >EU courts. The websites of Sachs described below, contain links to >contact Sachs, who welcomes public enquiries. > >For how to interview Dr Les Sachs, or Patricia Cornwell and her lawyers >and US government officials involved in the attacks upon Sachs, see >Patricia Cornwell Court Trial Documents: > >http://mytinyurl.net/708092 > > >How to access the banned journalism of Dr Les Sachs > >Since becoming a political refugee from the US, Dr Les Sachs published >many important pieces on the web in 2004-2007, as seen in the list of >banned writings below. These writings continued a long career of >publishing about US corruption since the 1980s. > >One should note that the intimidating against Google and the search >engines, sometimes have led to Google blocking web pages that even dare >to link to Dr Sachs, so be sure to avoid placing any direct html link if >you discuss Dr Sachs' writing on the internet. - Even this web page you >are reading might be blocked from Google and the search engines, if a >direct link was placed here. > >There are several websites with the banned material, but you can reach >all of them via the main website of Dr Les Sachs in Belgium: > >www (point) dr-les-sachs (point) be (Suggest to NOT put this on the web >as a direct link! - Any web page linking to this site directly, may be >blocked from Google by US orders!) > >Note that the domain suffix is 'be' (for Belgium) instead of 'com', and >those are hyphens within the web address, rather than underscores. > >From the main page of Dr Les Sachs' website, links are provided near the >top of the main page there, to a number of banned-and-blocked pieces of >his popular journalism. > >The banning orders served upon Google and the search engines, are not >always in perfect operation, as various people continue to try and link >and suggest Dr Sachs' banned journalism, so sometimes the banned >material does pop up in search results. > >Also, Dr Sachs allows all of his website journalism and content to be >freely republished by anyone, under the broadest kind of 'Creative >Commons' licence, and some people have been republishing the banned-and- >blocked material, trying to make it visible in other places. > >Here, a list of the major journalism pieces by Dr Les Sachs read and >passed around by others. > >From this list of the banned-and-blocked journalism of Dr Sachs, you can >already see evidence of falsehood of the US media articles which >attacked him. - Those articles often falsely suggest that the banning of >Dr Sachs' journalism, was principally 'harassment' or 'cyberstalking' of >the Bush family friend, political financier and author Patricia >Cornwell. > >But as you can see, most of the banned journalism is not even about >Patricia Cornwell. Most of the material that was banned - much of it >initially housed on a popular blogspot blog that was shut down by >Google, to please the US judges and CIA - is not even about Patricia >Cornwell. > >And the biography of Patricia Cornwell that was banned - the biography >that was labelled by US judges as allegedly 'cyberstalking' - is itself >supported by a bibliography of other suppressed articles - a >bibliography which the US judges also banned, of course - and by a set >of evidence files supporting the banned biography. > >It thus clear on the face of things, that the 'harassment of Cornwell' >story which was broadcast by US-UK media companies, was a deceptive ruse >to try and discredit a journalist with a wide-ranging critique of US >judicial corruption. > >In a nutshell, it seems the US corporate media have acted like a mafia, >helping the US judges and CIA and government to attack Dr Sachs and to >have him murdered as well as banned. > >Just below, as Dr Sachs says, "What the USA is now illegally trying to >block the world from finding on the internet": > > >List of major writings of Dr Les Sachs, that have been banned and >blocked from Google and the search engines (blocking may vary at any >individual moment) > >The "Complete Underground Guide and FAQ, to US Judicial and Legal >Corruption" (free online book) > >"America's Corrupt Legal System - Danger to Visitors, Travellers as Well >as USA Residents" > >"Americans Murdering Their Judges, and the American Crisis of Judicial >Corruption" > >The article that perhaps changed the US Supreme Court, possibly >preventing J. Harvie Wilkinson III from becoming Chief Justice: "Judge >J. Harvie Wilkinson III, His Cover-Up for 4th Circuit Judges and Bush >Friend Patricia Cornwell" > >"Detailed Biography of Dr Les Sachs" - the banned story of how Dr Sachs >became a political refugee in Europe > >"The CIA and Wikipedia" - Wikipedia and Answers-com, described as tools >of US government disinformation > >The 'Banned Biography' - "The True Early Life and Career of Author >Patricia Cornwell: Crimes & Scandals of a Friend of Bush, and Far-Right >Political Financier" > >"Footsteps of Anne Frank": US writer of Jewish heritage forced to take >political refuge in Europe > >"US Appeals Court filing of 3 April 2004" - composed in hiding inside >the US, before Dr Sachs escaped over the border - A 125-count court >filing served up as high as the Supreme Court of the United States, but >apparently never answered by US judges, detailing alleged crimes of US >federal judges with Bush's financier friend Patricia Cornwell > > >Once again, to access the above writings, > >There are several websites with the banned material, but you can reach >all of them via the main website of Dr Les Sachs in Belgium: > >www (point) dr-les-sachs (point) be (Suggest to NOT put this on the web >as a direct link! - Any web page linking to this site directly, may be >blocked from Google by US orders!) > >Note that the domain suffix is 'be' (for Belgium) instead of 'com', and >those are hyphens within the web address, rather than underscores. > >To view some of the proof files regarding the US criminal acts against >Dr Les Sachs, that forced him to become a refugee; or for researchers >who would like data on how to interview sources for this article for >themselves, see 'Patricia Cornwell Court Trial Documents': > >http://cornwell-trial-documents.skyrock.com/ > > >Also, related journalism of Dr Les Sachs on MWC News > >An alternative news service based in Canada, MWC News ("Media with >Conscience"), has been brave enough to continue to publish several >articles from Dr Sachs despite the intimidation of the rather large >media attack campaign conducted against Sachs during 2007. The online >MWC articles of Dr Sachs are as follows: > >"Foreign Companies Face Risk of US Court Corruption: Doing Business in >the Big Bribery Nation" >http://mwcnews.net/content/view/12075/254/ > >"US Government Attacks on Jews, versus the Power of the US 'Jewish >Lobby'" >http://mwcnews.net/content/view/12782/254/ > >"BBC Showing Saddam Snuff Video - The Darkest Propaganda Game of All" >http://mwcnews.net/content/view/11580/26/ > >See also these articles: > >US Justice sources: US 'Trials' of Political Refugee in Europe Were Both >Fraudulent > >http://www.indymedia.nl/nl/2009/02/57826.shtml - also at: >http://mytinyurl.net/bee8e8 > > >Two EU Writers Under Threat of Murder: Roberto Saviano and Dr Les Sachs > >http://lombardia.indymedia.org/node/13581 - also at: >http://mytinyurl.net/10e98 > >Published along with a public domain photo of the political refugee from >the USA Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs at the EU Parliament, under threat of >death alongside Roberto Saviano: > > >http://cornwell-trial-documents.skyrock.com/ > > >- Dan Hajidah > >Abdan "Dan" Hajidah is a researcher who has supplied documented source >material to journalists at leading news outlets in Europe. He spreads >his time among several northern European countries. > >Dan can be reached by e-mail at: firstname.lastname@example.org > > >This is published with a maximally open Creative Commons Licence and GNU >Free Documentation Licence: >
alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" >src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/3.0/80x15.png"/>
This >work is licenced under a
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">Creative Commons >Licence
. >Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document >under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or >any later version published by the Free Software Foundation. A copy of >the license is available at: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html.
l'invio del messaggio richiede diversi secondi.
Non premere piï¿½ volte il tasto "Invia".